[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Bug 230] removeParticipant restriction
http://services.arjuna.com/wscaf-issues/show_bug.cgi?id=230 ------- Additional Comments From mark.little@arjuna.com 2005-02-17 12:26 ------- Martin proposes adding message (notification) from registration service to registering service saying "you have been removed". Mark makes motion: Text around participantRemoved message makes it clear that it MAY be sent from registration service to the registering service without having previously received a removeParticipant message. Kevin seconds That is, we will reuse same message as a response. Effectively make removeParticipant optional for completion of this [IN] / OUT. Discussion: Looking for parallel request and response going in the other direction rather than (confusing) optional request message. These new messages (logical in / out) would have new names. Martin would like to amend motion to create new message (participantHasBeenRemoved) sent from registration service to registering service instead. Tony seconds on amendment, vote is 2 / 2 / 2 - defeated (notation is for / against / abstain) on original motion, passed without objection ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]