Re: [ws-caf] Updated table of requests and responses for WS-Context and WS-CF

[TONY FLETCHER <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>]

Dear Colleagues,

The answer to Mark's question about the question mark
against UserCTXService for the requestedContext row is
as Kevin correctly divined that I found a response of
requestedContext and could not determine what the
corresponding request message was.  From the exchange
between Kevin and Mark I take it that is the
requestedContext that is wrong (a hangover from a
previous draft and therefore that row in the table
should be removed.

You should all note that about from the response
message for each request I have guessed at appropriate
alternate responses so you all check that you agree
with my 'selection' before we write it into the spec -
otherwise I am certainly happy for the editors to make
use of it now.

Best regards   Tony
--- Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com> wrote:
> If we're all happy with the table as is (minus the ?
> and associated 
> update to the specification), then the editors can
> take this and fold it 
> into the next revision. Any comments?
> 
> Mark.
> 
> 
> TONY FLETCHER wrote:
> 
> >Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >I have now been able to my action from the WS-CAF
> TC
> >meeting (or one a few back!) to update the table of
> >requests and responses for WS-Context and WS-CF. 
> If
> >you think it is incorrect, you are probably right! 
> >Please let me have any comments and observations
> and I
> >will look into rectifying.
> >
> >Best regards Tony
> >tony.fletcher@choreology.com
> >
> 
> -- 
> Mark Little
> Chief Architect
> Arjuna Technologies Ltd
> www.arjuna.com
> 
>