RE: [ws-caf] Context query

["Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>]

I would say not.  Perhaps we can discuss this during Monday's call.  I
for one would be in favor of maintaining the ability to pass opaque
context through an intermediary that may not have knowledge of the
referencing spec.

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Conner [mailto:Kevin.Conner@arjuna.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:43 AM
To: WS-CAF
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] Context query

> Yes, I think it's still a good idea to support opaque context passing
> through intermediaries.  

I think there is still a need for discussion on this topic.

The changes made recently to context remove the context element,
requiring the referencing specifications to define their own context
element.  This removes a mechanism for easy identification of context
headers (and therefore opaque treatment of such headers).

Is this something we want to restrict at this stage?

	Kev

-- 
Kevin Conner
Arjuna Technologies Ltd.