[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] [Fwd: Groups - oasis - New ballot "Approve WS-ContextV1 as a Committee Draft"]
The minutes are correct. I think the confusion arises because the vote to adopt WS-Context needs to be conducted by Jamie I believe, *after* the 15 day review period. Correct? Mark. Martin Chapman wrote: >I am really confused! The minutes from the 24th show context arleady >being voted as CD and >to be put out for public review so what is the point of this ballot, and >why does it end nov 30th? >Also the same minutes recored ws-cf being voted as cd and being put out >for public review. > >Can someone please clarify. > >Martin. > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:17 AM >>To: Doug Bunting >>Cc: ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: Re: [ws-caf] [Fwd: Groups - oasis - New ballot >>"Approve WS-Context V1 as a Committee Draft"] >> >> >>You're right. The should refer to the latest version of WS-Context and >>not WS-CF. >> >>There should be a separate announcement for WS-CF to go to >>public review. >> >>Mark. >> >> >>Doug Bunting wrote: >> >> >> >>>The referenced document (WS-CF) and the ballot (WS-Context) seem to >>>conflict. I am struggling to remember what we are actually >>> >>> >>voting on. >> >> >>>thanx, >>> doug >>> >>> >>-- >>Mark Little >>Chief Architect >>Arjuna Technologies Ltd >>www.arjuna.com >> >> >> >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]