I noticed that the PIM removed two of the three attributes in the LinkType class (URI and linkedUid, leaving reference). With LinkType only having a single attribute, it becomes somewhat extraneous. Why not just have the RelationLink.relationship point to the reference as a URI || String || UID as documented for LinkType.reference, rather than pointing to a LinkType that points to reference?
- Steve
Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
Distinguished Research Fellow
Carnegie Mellon University
NASA Research Park
Building 23 (MS 23-11)
P.O. Box 1
Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
Email: steve.ray@sv.cmu.edu
Phone: (650) 587-3780
Cell: (202) 316-6481
Skype: steverayconsulting
