Question for second reviews

In WS-Calendar, we got 79 comments during public review. It is my understanding that we release the second PR with only changes up for review the second time.

26 of the comments are trivial, i.e., grammatical, or duplicated words, or.. (some of these comments are duplicates) I would like to make those trivial changes, accept those changes, and then track the only substantial differences going forward. Is this acceptable practice in the new TC process?

"If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well"
Peter Drucker

Toby Considine

Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

Facilities Technology Office
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073

http://www.oasis-open.org

blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

ws-calendar message