[OASIS Issue Tracker] (WSCALENDAR-551) Is LinkType Class needed? Yes!

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

William Cox updated WSCALENDAR-551:
-----------------------------------

       Summary: Is LinkType Class needed? Yes!  (was: Is LinkType Class needed?)
    Resolution: 
The abstract class for LinkType is intended for PSM designers to apply whatever referencing/linking approach they require. If this were an ordinary class the comments would be entirely correct.

Created a separate item to include in Notation section that the purple class background indicates an abstract class.

Also a separate item to enhance the note in CS01 line 427 quoted in a comment.

> Is LinkType Class needed? Yes!
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSCALENDAR-551
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-551
>             Project: OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: PIM
>    Affects Versions: PIM CS01
>         Environment: Steve Ray
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-calendar-comment/201502/msg00001.html
>            Reporter: William Cox
>            Assignee: William Cox
>
> From email:
> I noticed that the PIM removed two of the three attributes in the LinkType class (URI and linkedUid, leaving reference). With LinkType only having a single attribute, it becomes somewhat extraneous. Why not just have the RelationLink.link point to the reference as a URI || String || UID as documented for LinkType.reference, rather than pointing to a LinkType that points to reference?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)