OK, So an Availability has *more stuff* than a recurrence.
Are there any elements of a recurrence that an Availability should *not* have?
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:dtStart"
minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"
/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:rDate"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:recurrenceRule"
minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:exDate"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:dtEnd"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
A dtStart
A possible list of one or more explicit recurrence dates
One or more recurrence rules
A possible list if dates to be excluded
A possible end date
Also, on a related issue, may a recurrence object have zero recurrenceRules (RRules)?
I am working on the model that a recurrence is a means to get a set of start DateTimes.
The first element of the set is the dtStart.
The RRules are used to compute additional start Dates in using dtStart as an starting point
The rDates explicitly add additional members to the set.
The exDates explicitly remove members from the set already computed
If this is correct, then zero rRules should be legitimate. If not in RFC5545, it could be in the PIM.
And finally, to clear up fog in my mind
Can a single recurrence have more than one rRule based on the [single] initial dtStart?
“Starting January 1, we will meet each Tuesday as well as the 3rd Thursday of each month”
Tc
“It is the theory that decides what can be observed."
—Albert Einstein
|
Toby Considine
Phone: (919)962-9073
Information Technology Services
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC
|
Email:
Toby.Considine@unc.edu
Chair, OASIS OBIX Technical Committee
Chair, OASIS WS-Calendar Technical Committee
Editor, OASIS EMIX, Energy Interoperation TC
|
From: ws-calendar@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:ws-calendar@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Mike Douglass
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:25 PM
To: ws-calendar@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-calendar] Schema for Recurrence and PIM
They are very different:
A VAVAILABILITY defines the window inside which AVAILABILITY objects take effect - it creates a block of busy time.
Each AVAILABILITY object carves out a hole in that space and may be recurring or non-recurring.
In addition to the recurring rules an availability might contain it also hold properties describing that availability.
This is how we can specify something like
Available every Monday 9am-11am in Room 303
Available every Thursday 3pm-4pm in Room 410
We can add location, or any other property we feel appropriate
On 3/21/15 5:58 PM, Toby Considine wrote:
A VAvailability consist of some annotation and a set of one to many Avaliabilities.
Is there any difference between an Avaiability and a Recurrence? TO be specific, is this true:
<!-- Properties that take
a recurrence value -->
<xs:element
name="availability"
type="mpsm:RecurrenceType"/>
If these definitions are already in place:
<xs:element
name="recurrence"
type="mpsm:RecurrenceType"/>
<xs:complexType
name="RecurrenceType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>The
Recurrence Type consists of a seed date or date-time, rules to compute compute off-sets of that seed date, an optional end or final boundary to the series, and optional exclusions, i.e., dates to be skipped. See RFC 5545 section 3.3.10 for a discussion.
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:dtStart"
minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"
/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:rDate"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:recurrenceRule"
minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:exDate"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:dtEnd"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<!-- recurrence
-->
<xs:element
name="recurrenceRule"
type="mpsm:RecurrenceRuleType"/>
<xs:complexType
name="RecurrenceRuleType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>The
Recurrence Rule Type is a name value pair consisting of Rule Part and Rule Values. The legal values for each Rule Part are specifed in RFC5545. There is no rule specifying the order for serializing rules; in whaterver order they appear, they must be processed
in the order specified for processing rule parts in RFC5545.See RFC 5545 section 3.3.10 for a discussion.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:recurRulePart"
minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"
/>
<xs:element
ref="mpsm:recurRuleValues"
minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"
/>
</xs:sequence></xs:complexType>
tc
“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”
– George Bernard Shaw.