It ought to be identical - other than date and name.
The slight differences are probably due to changes in their xml to
rfc tool.
On 3/27/15 11:33 AM, William Cox wrote:
Mike -
Thanks for the notice.
On careful comparison, except for the dates and title (and an
occasional extra or removed space) the documents seem identical.
I'm updating WD15 to reference this new "Draft 00".
Thanks for not changing section numbers :-)
bill
--
On 3/24/15 10:36 AM, Mike Douglass
wrote:
Not
that the spec is being dealt with by a working group its name
has changed:
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-calext-availability-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Michael Douglass and posted
to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-ietf-calext-availability
Revision: 00
Title: Calendar Availability
Document date: 2015-03-23
Group: calext
Pages: 22
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-calext-availability-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-availability/
Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calext-availability-00
Abstract:
This document specifies a new iCalendar calendar component
that
allows the publication of available and unavailable time
periods
associated with a calendar user. This component can be used
in
standard iCalendar free-busy lookups, including iTIP
free-busy
requests, to generate repeating blocks of available or busy
time with
exceptions as needed.
This document also defines extensions to CalDAV
calendar-access and
calendar-auto-schedule which specify how this new calendar
component
should be used when doing free-busy time evaluation in
CalDAV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in
OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
|