RRules in Recurrence

["Toby Considine" <Toby.Considine@gmail.com>]

In the schema we used to develop the PIM, there are 1-infinite rrules in a Recurrence.

 

Is this correct?

 

As I understand the logic:

 

A Recurrence is a means to compute a collection of dtStarts.

1.       It begins with a single dtStart.

2.       It adds 0-to-many rDates

3.       It computes additiona rDates with RRules

4.       It uses exDate to remove dates from the collection assembled as above.

 

It is unclear why 0 [no] rrules is not legal.

I think because of the “bag of properties] aspect of the original that this is not clear.

 

tc

 

 

 

---

“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”

– George Bernard Shaw.

---

Toby Considine TC9, Inc. Toby.Considine@gmail.com Phone: (919)619-2104 http://www.tc9.com

Chair, OASIS OBIX Technical Committee Chair, OASIS WS-Calendar Technical Committee Editor, OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (EMIX) Editor, OASIS Energy Interoperation blog: http://www.NewDaedalus.com