[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (WSCALENDAR-571) conformance targets not well-defined
Toby Considine created WSCALENDAR-571: ----------------------------------------- Summary: conformance targets not well-defined Key: WSCALENDAR-571 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-571 Project: OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC Issue Type: Bug Components: MIN Affects Versions: MIN CSDPR01 Environment: TAB Review Reporter: Toby Considine Assignee: Toby Considine The conformance targets or possible implementations that are subject to conformance are not well defined: we read "Implementations and specifications " in the conformance clause. These need be defined even if only intuitively. What is the difference between Implementations and specifications ? Can we use another term than "specifications" which is rather overloaded (also used for "this specifications" - are we talking of different classes of specifications?). At some other place we read "an application or specification..." - needs be defined too in this context. The base specification (PIM V1.0) also uses "specifications" as conformance target, but not defined. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]