The Jira Items are simple and don't
really require discussion..
With the TC's direction, I can include them and create
another working draft before March 11.
Bill:
One issue is direction from the TAB on how to improve
Conformance. I have assigned that issue to you. If you could
please at least comment on them, and assign back to me, then I
can prepare a new draft based on the public review.
STRMS , then is next. Would members read that specification
AS IF we were ready to vote it out.
I think that covers the business of the meeting.
Gershon, please cancel the meeting, but prepare to have an
agenda and meeting on the 11th.
tc
I've seen the jira issues as they float past, but haven't
had time to review them.
Toby, can we get all the review items together for March 11?
I suspect today is too early, and would cancel today's
meeting.
thanks!
bill
--
On 2/26/16 6:43 AM, Gershon
Janssen wrote:
Hi all,
Do we have sufficient topics that warrant a meeting
today? Or is it better to plan for our next meeting on
March 11?
We have a few comments on MIN and a number of Jira
issues from a previous Streams Public Review that
require discussion given the completed PIM and new
Stream WD.
I'm a little short on time today and haven't
reviewed the new Stream WD in-depth yet, so I wouldn't
mind skipping today.
Please advice.
Regards,
Gershon Janssen