[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the posted 05 document
OK. For some reason the minutes did not reflect the precise deadline for the comments. I will clarify that in an email to the TC as well as on the Thursday's call this week. On the second point, I was NOT suggesting that the editors change the publicly visible documents until Oct 18th 9AM Pacific. I was rather suggesting that the editors post to the mailing list comments about any anomalies, errors in the specs that they are aware of. This is simply to avoid flooding of similar feedback from everybody. Thanks, Sanjay > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:paul@wso2.com] > Sent: Tuesday, Oct 11, 2005 14:21 PM > To: Patil, Sanjay > Cc: Yalcinalp, Umit; Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the posted 05 document > > Sanjay > > I thought I had said on the call all comments by 9am Pacific > Oct 18th, > and then the final version to be available for the ballot to > start 9am > Pacific Oct 20th. > > I agree thoroughly that it would be good if we could have > edits in place > before then, so if no-one finds any more anomalies then the > doc need not > change from 18th->20th. > > Paul > > > Patil, Sanjay wrote: > > > > I am not sure if the editors get 2 full days. This is what > we agreed > > on the last call: > > TC members need to get all editorial comments by Oct 18, > and the kavi > > ballots will be initiated on the morning of Oct 20. > > > > If you believe that you need 2 full days (which seems reasonable to > > me), we could request the following to the TC - Submit comments by > > Noon Pacifc of Oct 18 and open the ballot at Noon Pacific on Oct 20. > > > > I also agree that it will be helpful for the TC if the editors > > proactively posted the anomalies, errors that they are aware of. > > > > Thanks, > > Sanjay > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > *From:* Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, Oct 11, 2005 12:55 PM > > *To:* Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the posted 05 document > > > > As long as we get at least two days to incorporate changes to > > drafts before posting it to the tc, it should be ok. > > > > As far as Anish's concern is concerned, I agree that we > should not > > update the docs. I am wondering however whether we should inform > > the tc about such anomalies so that we don't hear from multiple > > folks about the same problem in order to indicate that we are > > aware of the issue and it will be fixed. > > > > > > --umit > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] > > *Sent:* Saturday, Oct 08, 2005 3:19 AM > > *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > *Subject:* Re: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the > posted 05 document > > > > > > this raises the question of how to handle any fixes for the > > draft CDs. Resetting the 2-week clock each time isn't good. > > So I suggest that at the end of the 2 weeks we post another > > diff'd version - where the original version is the draft CD > > w/all changes accepted - and the diff'd version > shows just the > > changes we made since the posting of the draft CDs. > In there > > we can include the fix to the section 4 formatting. > > -Doug > > > > > > > > *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>* > > > > 10/07/2005 08:46 PM > > > > > > To > > "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> > > cc > > ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject > > Re: [ws-rx-editors] Issue with the posted 05 document > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Umit, > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. You're right, we need to do > > 'Tools->Update > > All' before generating the PDFs. I looked at the two docs > > (more pairs of > > eyes are most welcome) -- sxw and pdf versions -- > and the only > > problem > > that I saw (wrt updating of indexes) was with the 'Table of > > Contents'. > > Fortunately, there is no problem with the line numbers. So > > this in > > itself would not require us to generate another draft. > > > > But I noticed another problem. In the #2 version at [1] > > updated by Gil, > > the formating for 'Fault', section 4, was removed. > As a result > > the old > > section 4 was included as subsections of 3. This got carried > > forward in > > subsequent drafts (if you recall I had pointed this out > > earlier on this > > ML [2]). > > > > Not sure if this requires us to generate another > draft that is > > uploaded > > to the main TC page. Since the 2 week clock started > yesterday, > > changing > > the daft now may make some people unhappy. If folks look at > > the diff-ed > > version though it is much clearer as to what happened. > > > > I'm inclined not to do any updates to the main page > right now and > > include this as a change when we approve the CD at > the end of > > the two > > week's period. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Anish > > -- > > > > [1] > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow > nload.php/14670/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-05.sxw > > [2] > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/ema il/archives/200509/msg00056.html > > > > Yalcinalp, Umit wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > I ran into this problem today with Policy spec > and realized > > that the > > > posted version for WSRM spec has a similar issue (I > > corrected mine > > > before posting it though :-)) > > > > > > When you generate pdfs (no change bars) either > after accepting > > > changes/turning of change bars, you must regenerate the > > indexes from > > > Tools. Otherwise, the index does not align with the spec > > sections and > > > pages. > > > > > > Just another day in paradise, > > > > > > --umit > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > Vice President of Technology > WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > Yahoo IM: paulfremantle > Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729 > paul@wso2.com > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]