Weird, now I can see the change bars in
the doc. Before I only saw the ones on the first page.
So Paul’s comment here looks like it
applies to 548-549 in the doc without change bars, or in other words the text for
/wsrm:AckRequested/{any}. It could also indicate a problem with /wsrm/CloseSequence/{any}
which in the diff doc is what it looks like it should have been deleted with
when it got moved. It so happens that each of these definitions is the same.
Looking at the diff and the regular doc they both look correct. Perhaps by
coincidence the definition appeared on the same lines after the move so it didn’t
get tagged as a change in the diff version.
There is another similar irregularity in
the diff at lines 856-857 which would potentially impact /wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement/wsrm:AcknowledgementRange@{any},
/wsrm:AckRequested@{any}, or /wsrm:CloseSequence@{any}.
Another one again at 892-896 potentially
impacting /wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement/{any} and /wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse/{any}
and/or /wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement@{any} and /wsrm:CloseSequenceResponse@{any}.
Looking in the diff version and the normal
version these all seem fine. I think the diff just got mixed up because of the
same definitions used under these different extensibility points.
Now that I can see the dif I see other oddness
at 479-482, 919-921, 923-937, 1095-1100, 1104-1117, 1120-1125, 1131-1135, 1138-1151,
1163-1165, and 1166-1174. These all seem to be inserted and deleted text that
is identical.
The main doc looks fine, other than the
date issue. I say fix that and ship it.
From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005
12:04 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
I looked at this and a big part of 3.7 is
marked as deleted but there appears to be a fragment of this section remaining.
See lines 807-808.
From: Gilbert Pilz
[mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: November 15, 2005 11:40 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Paul
Cotton
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
I've attached the files I'm going to
publish. If you review them you will notice that there are more changes flagged
than just those outlined in the resolution of i047. This is due to the fact
that I fixed one editorial nit (double spaces) before Doug convinced me that we
should stick to a strict interpretation of step (2) below. I know its a bit
confusing, but putting back a bunch of double spaces is both tedious and a
waste of time. Just consider it a preview of all the nits to come . . .
- g
From: Gilbert
Pilz
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005
2:04 PM
To:
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors]
Publishing wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
At the last F2F we agreed that we would do the following:
2.) re-order the sub-sections per Doug's suggestion
3.) re-publish the new WD
Nobody said anything about making any other changes in step
(3). In the spirit of following the directions of the TC I think we should
publish wsrm-1.1-spec-wd06 (warts and all) and address the various editorial
flaws in wd-07.