|
It depends on how much you want
to read into the label "yyyymm". On one end of the spectrum you could say that
the label is completely arbitrary and we are only using year and month as a
handy way to pick something unique. On the other end of the spectrum you could
insist that the year and month must accurately reflect the exact year and month
on which "something important" (like a CD being accepted etc.) happens (of
course then you get into arguments about what this "something important"
is).
Personally I tend to fall
somewhere in the middle of this spectrum. According to our own policies we need
to change the namespace URI. "200602" is certainly different from "200510" and
that's good enough for now.
- gp
Yes.
Assuming the CD passes, should
the namespace be updated to 200603 rather than
200602?
Before you throw anything at me
I’m not sure it should be. Particularly if we put together a new CD to go to
PR before the end of this month. I’m not sure that’s feasible, but if it is we
might want to still have the availability of the 200603 dated
namespace.
Marc
Goodner
Technical
Diplomat
Microsoft
Corporation
Tel: (425)
703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
|