[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F
Guys Would it be worth having a short review of the interop scenarios at the F2F? We already had one at the first F2F, but I'm wondering if we need our minds refreshed. Paul Patil, Sanjay wrote: > > It will be desirable to get the input from the Interop Subcommittee > (bugs in the spec, essentially new issues if any) before the March > (tentatively) F2Fin order to have enough time to accommodate the input > before sending the specs out for public review. Doug, would that be > possible with your proposed schedule for the Interop Subcommittee? > > Thanks, > Sanjay > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] > *Sent:* Monday, Dec 12, 2005 8:41 AM > *To:* ws-rx-implement@lists.oasis-open.org > *Subject:* [ws-rx-implement] Interoperability and the F2F > > > Updated the proposal to make it relative to the next CD since > basing an interop > on WDs doesn't make as much sense. Changed dates to be relative > dates. > __________________ > > In terms of presenting something to the TC during next week's > F2F, what about this: > > DD/MM - TC approves next CD > > + 4wks - Send a draft scenario document to the TC. > This scenario doc should try to cover interoperability > for the features defined in the core spec. [*] > > + 2wks - Final date for feedback from the TC on the doc. > TC doesn't need to formally approve it but we request > suggestions/comments by this date. > > + 2wks - Unless we totally messed up the first draft and just need > to make minor changes based on the feedback, we > produce the official scenario doc that will be used > for the interop event. > Send out an official notification of the interop event > and doc(s). > > + 6wks - Shoot for an interop event this week. > Previous interops allowed for 6 weeks between scenario doc > being published and the event itself. > > [*] Questions: > > Both specs or just core spec? Do we want people to support > ws-policy? I'm leaning towards just the core spec. > > What type of event do we want? Personally, I like the idea of > a virtual interop but I know that the pressure of a f2f helps > force people to make the dates. > (virtual == put up an endpoint (RMS and RMD) on the web) > for example: http://wsi.alphaworks.ibm.com:8080/wsrm/index.html > so people can test at will) > > What kind of results do we want to publish and how do we want to > publish them? Generic: "it went well" - or specific "company X > passed 1,2,3 but not 4,5,6" ??? Do we even want to publish > anything at all? What does Oasis require? > > thoughts? > > thanks > -Doug > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com Yahoo IM: paulfremantle VOIP: +44 844 986 2874 Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729 Fax: +44 844 484 7459 paul@wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]