[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names
+1 abbie > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:00 AM > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Document Names > > > +1 to preserving the names as they are. > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > "Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> wrote on 07/14/2005 12:15:29 AM: > > > Title: Document Names > > Description: Should the ?names? of the normative documents > remain the > same as the submission > > documents or should they be changed? This issue applies to both > WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-RM Policy. > > Justification: The ?name? of a document effects a number of things > > such > as the document > > identifier, URIs etc. > > Target: core, policy > > Type: editorial > > Proposal: Preserve the name of the documents as submitted. Changing > > the > names would increase > > confusion (already at a high level) around ?OASIS and RM? > and result > > in > extra effort. There does > > not seem to be any reasons for changing the names forcefull > enough to > override these concerns. > > Therefore the names of the normative documents should be > ?Web Services > Reliable Messaging Protocol > > (WS-ReliableMessaging)? and ?Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy > Assertion (WS-RM Policy)? > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]