RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

Let's keep in mind that the AIR is still a draft and that there is still a 
possibility that feedback may result in changes.

I think that we should approach this in a manner that we have some 
flexibility to tentatively diverge from 
the AIR as published and submit our recommendations back to the TAB, etc.

Note that there are at least a couple of us in the TC that are also 
members of the TAB:-)

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> wrote on 07/14/2005 01:20:45 PM:

> A couple of answers:
> 
> 1. I'm fine with using "wsrx" as the value of the "tc" component.
> 
> 2. My reading of some of the examples in the guidelines and in other TCs
> lead me to believe that we had to use "01" etc. but you are correct in
> that this removes the chance of using minor versions (a bad thing). I'm
> fine with using "1.0" as the productVersion.
> 
> I'll ammend my proposals to make these changes. I'm looking for
> suggestions on the "artifactName" component. The guidelines are
> confusing (at least to me) on this one.
> 
> - g
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Niblett [mailto:peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:15 AM
> To: Gilbert Pilz
> Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required Artifact Metadata
> 
> I have a couple of questions:
> 
> 1. The guidelines at
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13344/ArtifactIdentifi
> cationRequirements-v1.0-wd-15.pdf
>  say that the tc: component should be the short name of the TC with
> hyphens removed, i.e. wsrx. You have put "tbd", does this mean that you
> are looking at an alternative?
> 
> 2. The guidelines permit the use of 1.0 as the productVersion, and that
> appears to be the form used in the current WDs (and other OASIS specs).
> Are you proposing not to use a minor version?
> 
> 
> Peter Niblett
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>              "Gilbert Pilz"
> 
>              <Gilbert.Pilz@bea
> 
>              .com>
> To 
>                                        <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
>              14/07/2005 05:19
> cc 
> 
> 
> 
> Subject 
>                                        [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Required
> 
>                                        Artifact Metadata
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Title: Required Artifact Metadata
> 
> 
> Description: OASIS guidelines (
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13344/ArtifactIdentifi
> cationRequirements-v1.0-wd-15.pdf
> ) require that the artifacts (documents, schemas, etc.) produced by a TC
> should have a minimum set of of metadata that describes these artifacts.
> 
> 
> Justification: OASIS requirement.
> 
> 
> Target: core, policy
> 
> 
> Type: editorial
> 
> 
> Proposal: We propose the following values for each specification:
> 
> 
> WS-ReliableMessaging:
> 
> 
>       artifactName: TBD
> 
> 
>       tc: TBD
> 
> 
>       product: wsreliablemessaging
> 
> 
>       productVersion: 01
> 
> 
>       artifactType: spec
> 
> 
>       stage: wd
> 
> 
>       descriptiveName: Web Services Reliable Messaging Protocol
>       Specification
> 
> 
> WS-RM Policy:
> 
> 
>       artifactName: TBD
> 
> 
>       tc: TBD
> 
> 
>       product: wsrmpolicy
> 
> 
>       productVersion: 01
> 
> 
>       artifactType: spec
> 
> 
>       stage: wd
> 
> 
>       descriptiveName: Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion
>       Specification
> 
> 
> Note that the "product names" of these two artifacts differ.
> 
>