[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on 7/21 conf-call
+1 abbie > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:17 PM > To: Patil, Sanjay > Cc: wsrx > Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion > on 7/21 conf-call > > > Sanjay, > > With regards to these issues, I think that we should first > focus on the > requirements and usage scenarios > rather than discuss any specifics as to how we might address > them. I think > I made this point on the last call. > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > "Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> wrote on 07/18/2005 > 03:18:10 PM: > > > > > > > i006 Source based delivery QoS policy assertion > > > > > http://www.oasis-> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/ > > Re > > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i006 > > Please see Tom's posting on 7/14 for use cases and motivations: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200507/msg00108.html > > > > i008 Policy assertions granularity > > > > > http://www.oasis-> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/ > > Re > > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i008 > > > > i009 Declaration of QoS policies > > > > > http://www.oasis-> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13598/ > > Re > > liableMessagingIssues.xml#i009 > > > > On the 7/14 conf-call, Tom kindly agreed to own the issue i006. He > > also posted a set of use cases and motivation summary on > 7/14 (before > > the conf call - see link above). Please check this and > other relevant > > email discussion before the next conf-call. > > > > The above listed issues seem to be interrelated. It will > be great to > > have someone first present to the TC a wider context that > highlights > > the interrelationships, based on which we can set an order for > > discussing these issues and avoid going in circles. Any volunteers? > > > > Thanks, > > Sanjay > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]