[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] ISSUE I0006 and Substibutabllity of Delivery Assurancelevels
Tom Rutt wrote: > Tom Rutt wrote: I think that the last two "delivery assurances" (named "monotonic" and "at least once in order) are of no value and should be eliminated from consideration. The extra cost of filtering dupicates is nil. I posted the simplified contribution as : http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/13705/DASubstitution.htm This is what I would prefer people to use as the basis of discussion for Issue 006. Tom Rutt > >> This email introduces the concept of substitubility of Delivery >> Assurance levels, to aid in discussing Issue 0006. > > > > Small mistake, on the row of the substitutabiliy matrix for exactly > once, change the two (rule 1) column entries to (rule 2). > >> >> Tom Rutt >> Fujitsu >> ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]