[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: anonymous AcksTo
David Orchard wrote: <snip/> > > This solves the problem, that the MEP isn't transformed from a one-way > into a two-way. > > Personally, I think the anonymous IRI is actually inappropriate for this > case. The WS-Addressing working group is probably (or has?) added > another special name for "not allowed". Imagine that a ReplyTo has > "not-allowed" value which really clearly says it's a one-way mep, and > then there's an anonymous ackTo. > > I'd suggest a friendly mod to Proposal 2 to say call out a "not allowed" > IRI in the AcksTo. It might also need a bit more to say that > "anonymous" IRI is not allowed when MEP is one-way. > To follow up on this, WS-Addressing has defined a "not allowed" IRI: "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/none" [1] [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-core.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]