Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Marc Goodner wrote:
> My interpretation of what owner means match yours. Right now there is a 
> link from the origin for all of the issues; in a lot of them that is 
> where the proposal is as well. In the next pass through and for the 
> future I’ll be sure to include the link in the proposal section as well 
> even if it has appeared earlier.
> 

Thanks Marc!
This would be useful when there isn't a proposal in the origin or there 
are multiple proposals (originating in different emails).

-Anish
--

PS: BTW, I completely missed out on the link from the origin. Since the 
hyperlinked text is the originator's name, I assumed a 'mailto:...' URI 
and did not bother to check (<insert-embarrassed-smiley-here>).


>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:36 AM
> *To:* Marc Goodner
> *Cc:* ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ws-rx] Unowned issues
> 
>  
> 
> Since I raised issues i002 and i003, I would be happy to be the owner.
> 
> I'm assuming that the owner is supposed to stimulate discussion on the 
> issue, keep track of the discussion, summarize the discussion/issue on 
> the call, etc, but is not necessarily responsible for generating 
> proposals/resolving the issues (although he/she may). Is that correct?
> (Although in the cases above, I would be willing to provide proposals.)
> 
> Suggestion for Marc:
> In the issue list, can we have a link to the emails in the justification 
> and proposal section. Currently, these two sections contain 
> cut-and-pasted text from the emails. This is helpful in most cases, but 
> sometimes it is necessary to look at the complete email/thread to get 
> the right context.
> 
> Thx.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Marc Goodner wrote:
> 
> We need owners for the following issues:
> 
>  
> 
> *i001 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i001#i001> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Bilateral sequence negotiation
> 
> *i002 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i002#i002> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> AckTo EPR and seq lifetime
> 
> *i003 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i003#i003> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> EPRs and sequence scope
> 
> *i004 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i004#i004> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> wsa:messageID uniqueness requirments for retransmission
> 
> *i005 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i005#i005> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received
> 
> *i007 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i007#i007> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> WSS 1.0/1.1 token support
> 
> *i010 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i010#i010> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Sequence port spanning
> 
> *i012 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i012#i012> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Anonymous acksTo
> 
> *i013 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i013#i013> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Max message number in policy
> 
> *i018 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i018#i018> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message number valid?
> 
> *i019 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/13758/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i019#i019> 
> *
> 
> 	
> 
> Sequence termination on Fault
> 
>  
> 
> Gilbert Pilz has volunteered on the editor list to take i014 – i017.
> 
>  
> 
> Personally I’ll volunteer to take i007 will review some the others for 
> potentially volunteering prior to tomorrow’s call. I suggest others do 
> the same.
> 
>  
> 
> I propose that we should not allow issues to be accepted any longer 
> without identifying an owner at the same time.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Marc g
>