OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014


Lets get on with the technical details and leave the name alone.
-bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abbie Barbir [mailto:abbieb@nortel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:27 PM
> To: Christopher B Ferris; Marc Goodner
> Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; Martin Chapman; Rich Salz; ws-
> rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> 
> +1
> abbie
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 12:44 PM
> > To: Marc Goodner
> > Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; Martin Chapman; Rich Salz;
> > ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Besides that, the namespace URI is different, regardless of
> > wether or not
> > some or all of the
> > path components are the same (and they are not in this case)
> > because the
> > two URIs have
> > different domains. Note that the [productname] != the
> > document title. They
> > are distinctly separate
> > metadata.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Christopher Ferris
> > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> > phone: +1 508 377 9295
> >
> > "Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> wrote on 08/03/2005
> > 12:09:44 PM:
> >
> > > Yes it is, ws-rm v1 contributed to OASIS, ws-rm v1.x OASIS standard.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:07 AM
> > > To: Marc Goodner; 'Rich Salz'
> > > Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> > >
> > > you mean its easy to explain ws-rm v 1- pre oasis - and
> > ws-rm v1-oasis
> > > spec :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 4:13 AM
> > > >To: Rich Salz
> > > >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > >Subject: RE: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Changing the name has significant impact for vendors in
> > > >explaining what version they support, i.e. it is much simpler
> > > >to explain support for two different versions with the same
> > > >name than the relationship between two differently named
> > > >specifications.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Marc g
> > > >
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]
> > > >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 10:53 AM
> > > >To: Marc Goodner
> > > >Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > >Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [WS-RX] Issue i014
> > > >
> > > >> Asking people to learn a
> > > >> new name for these specs to reduce confusion is counter
> > intuitive.
> > > >
> > > >Which is the greater audience -- those familiar with the pre-TC
> > > >documents, or those whose first exposure will be through
> > > >OASIS?  My bet
> > > >is the latter.
> > > >
> > > >   /r$
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> > > >DataPower Technology
> > http://www.datapower.com
> > > >XS40 XML Security Gateway
> > http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]