[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue i015: update to proposal
Looking at this again, I think that the product: strings are a bit long (and this is significant because they appear in URIs etc). Also they are inconsistent, as the policy one uses an abbreviation (wsrm) of the first. I would like to propose wsrm and wsrmp respectively. These would be consistent with examples shown in the AIR (e.g. wss, saml). In any case we will need to get the name we choose ratified by OASIS (as there might be a clash with the WS-RM TC tree of the OASIS document space). Peter Niblett IBM Senior Technical Staff Member "Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea .com> To "wsrx" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> 02/08/2005 22:21 cc Subject [ws-rx] Issue i015: update to proposal I'd like to update the proposal as follows: WS-ReliableMessaging: artifactName: TBD tc: wsrx product: wsreliablemessaging productVersion: 1.1 artifactType: spec stage: wd descriptiveName: Web Services Reliable Messaging Protocol Specification WS-RM Policy: artifactName: TBD tc: wsrx product: wsrmpolicy productVersion: 1.1 artifactType: spec stage: wd descriptiveName: Web Services Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion Specification Note that the product names of these two artifacts differ.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]