[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] proposal for i016
Yes, I suspect you are correct. Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 "Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> wrote on 08/18/2005 12:50:16 PM: > Shouldn't this be: > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-01.* > wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-01.* > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:13 AM > To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ws-rx] proposal for i016 > > I would like to make a counter proposal, consistent with the proposal > that > Peter Niblet made > (which I +1'ed) to use 'wsrm' and 'wsrmp' as the 'product' metadata > component: > > wsrm-01-spec-wd-01.* > wsrmp-01-spec-wd-01.* > > I would note that this proposal does NOT conflict with the document > identifiers used for WS-Reliability > which used the old document naming conventions: e.g. > wsrm-ws_reliability-v1.1-spec-os > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html > phone: +1 508 377 9295
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]