[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for i004
"A message MAY be retransmitted for any purpose including communications failure and MAY use the same [message id] property." http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-ws-addressing-20040810/#_Toc77464 322 So as I said no further clarification should be needed in WS-RM. -----Original Message----- From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:29 AM To: Marc Goodner Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for i004 Marc Goodner wrote: > I've looked into this issue and I believe it is not an issue and should > be closed as follows. > > > > Proposal: > > Web Services Addressing says that the wsa:messageID may be the same for > a retransmitted message. Therefore when a message is retransmitted with > the same wsrm:{Identifier, MessageNumber} pair the wsa:messageID may be > the same. The correct use of wsa:messageID need not be redocumented in > this specification therefore this issue should be closed with no action. > Shouldn't it say 'MUST' rather than a 'may'? Why would the wsa:MessageID (or more appropriately [message id]) be different for a retransmission in the context of WSRM? Or for that matter anything else in the Infoset that is transmitted. Also, can you point me to the text in WSA where it says this? Thx! -Anish --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]