[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposal for i004
+1 I don't think that the RM spec needs to add anything more. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 "Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> wrote on 08/25/2005 03:41:58 AM: > "A message MAY be retransmitted for any purpose including communications > failure and MAY use the same [message id] property." > > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-ws-addressing-20040810/#_Toc77464 > 322 > > So as I said no further clarification should be needed in WS-RM. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:29 AM > To: Marc Goodner > Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Proposal for i004 > > Marc Goodner wrote: > > I've looked into this issue and I believe it is not an issue and > should > > be closed as follows. > > > > > > > > Proposal: > > > > Web Services Addressing says that the wsa:messageID may be the same > for > > a retransmitted message. Therefore when a message is retransmitted > with > > the same wsrm:{Identifier, MessageNumber} pair the wsa:messageID may > be > > the same. The correct use of wsa:messageID need not be redocumented in > > > this specification therefore this issue should be closed with no > action. > > > > Shouldn't it say 'MUST' rather than a 'may'? Why would the wsa:MessageID > > (or more appropriately [message id]) be different for a retransmission > in the context of WSRM? Or for that matter anything else in the Infoset > that is transmitted. > > Also, can you point me to the text in WSA where it says this? > > Thx! > > -Anish > --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]