RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion

["Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>]

+1

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> Sent: September 8, 2005 3:31 PM
> To: Anish Karmarkar; Doug Davis
> Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
> 
> I have no issue with accepting all of the proposed use cases from this
> week's agenda and see no reason that discussion is needed on the call
> since there has been none on the list. I think a simple motion to
accept
> all them should suffice.
> 
> However, if we are determining charter scope in order to accept issues
> then I will need time to review each issue before discussion on the
call
> and propose deferring this item again until next week to do so. I, and
I
> believe others, have not spent time reviewing these use cases as they
> were not supposed to be evaluated for charter scope before accepting
> them. From the original motion to handle use cases: "Initially use
cases
> will have an undecided scope, and the TC will vote to accept use cases
> into the working set". I do not believe that evaluating these for
> charter scope during a TC call is in line with the motion that the TC
> accepted.
> 
> In fact it is not clear from the motion that charter scope was ever
> supposed to be evaluated for these. According to another other part of
> the proposal, "The TC will decide whether use cases are in scope or
out
> of scope for a given version of the specification". It is far too
early
> to have a discussion on this. Similar to the above I would also object
> to discussing this on today's call. We need to progress much further
> before any discussion of "versions" makes sense.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:28 AM
> To: Doug Davis
> Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
> 
> +1
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Doug Davis wrote:
> >
> > Paul/Gil,
> >   Sorry for the delay, just finished reading the docs Gil posted and
> > they all seem like valid use-cases to me (and things for the TC to
> think
> > about).
> > thanks,
> > -Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>*
> >
> > 09/05/2005 12:03 PM
> > Please respond to
> > paul
> >
> >
> >
> > To
> > 	"ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > 	[ws-rx] Use case discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > Please remember that Sanjay asked us to initiate discussion of the
> > proposed use cases on the email list *before* the Thursday call so
> that
> > the meeting time was kept to a minimum.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > --
> > Paul Fremantle
> > Co-Founder, Vice President of Technology
> > WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform"
> >
> > Yahoo IM: paulfremantle
> > Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729
> > Fax: +1 360 485-4275
> > paul@wso2.com
> >
> >