[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion
+1 /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] > Sent: September 8, 2005 3:31 PM > To: Anish Karmarkar; Doug Davis > Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Use case discussion > > I have no issue with accepting all of the proposed use cases from this > week's agenda and see no reason that discussion is needed on the call > since there has been none on the list. I think a simple motion to accept > all them should suffice. > > However, if we are determining charter scope in order to accept issues > then I will need time to review each issue before discussion on the call > and propose deferring this item again until next week to do so. I, and I > believe others, have not spent time reviewing these use cases as they > were not supposed to be evaluated for charter scope before accepting > them. From the original motion to handle use cases: "Initially use cases > will have an undecided scope, and the TC will vote to accept use cases > into the working set". I do not believe that evaluating these for > charter scope during a TC call is in line with the motion that the TC > accepted. > > In fact it is not clear from the motion that charter scope was ever > supposed to be evaluated for these. According to another other part of > the proposal, "The TC will decide whether use cases are in scope or out > of scope for a given version of the specification". It is far too early > to have a discussion on this. Similar to the above I would also object > to discussing this on today's call. We need to progress much further > before any discussion of "versions" makes sense. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:28 AM > To: Doug Davis > Cc: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Use case discussion > > +1 > > -Anish > -- > > Doug Davis wrote: > > > > Paul/Gil, > > Sorry for the delay, just finished reading the docs Gil posted and > > they all seem like valid use-cases to me (and things for the TC to > think > > about). > > thanks, > > -Doug > > > > > > > > *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>* > > > > 09/05/2005 12:03 PM > > Please respond to > > paul > > > > > > > > To > > "ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> > > cc > > > > Subject > > [ws-rx] Use case discussion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks > > > > Please remember that Sanjay asked us to initiate discussion of the > > proposed use cases on the email list *before* the Thursday call so > that > > the meeting time was kept to a minimum. > > > > Paul > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > > Co-Founder, Vice President of Technology > > WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" > > > > Yahoo IM: paulfremantle > > Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729 > > Fax: +1 360 485-4275 > > paul@wso2.com > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]