Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Reorder spec sections

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

It could be purely editorial, although if there's need of any glue text, 
that would be non-editorial.

I don't really have any objection... My recommendation would be to give it 
a try editorially and then
socialize the reorganized spec with the TC to see if there are any 
objections.

Cheers,

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote on 09/21/2005 02:29:58 
AM:

> Makes sense.
> Although I would classify this issue as editorial rather than design.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Doug Davis wrote:
> > 
> > Title: Reorder spec sections
> > 
> > Description:
> > The current order in which the RM spec talks about the protocol 
elements 
> > is:
> >         Sequence header
> >         SeqAck header
> >         ReqAck header
> >         CreateSequence
> >         TerminateSequence
> >         CloseSequence
> > I'd like to reorder them based on how we actually expect people to use 

> > them.
> > 
> > Justification:
> > Helps in understanding the spec.
> > 
> > Target: wsrm spec
> > 
> > Type: design
> > 
> > Proposal:
> > 
> > Change the order to be:
> >         CreateSequence
> >         Sequence header
> >         ReqAck header
> >         SeqAck header
> >         CloseSequence
> >         TerminateSequence
> > 
> > Related issues: none