Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

I think that everyone would agree that the final ws-rm spec should 
reference the W3C Rec
once ws-addr becomes a rec.

It's really something that could be deferred until such time as TimBL does 
his thang and grants
REC status to ws-addr.

However, if the editors want the extra work:-)

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote on 09/20/2005 04:01:55 
PM:

> Title: Which version of WS-Addressing spec?
> 
> Description:
> Page 25, lines 664-665 at [1] says:
> "WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property the 
> default fault action URI defined in the version of WS-Addressing used in 

> the message."
> 
> This can be interpreted as any version of WS-Addressing is allowed with 
> WSRM. WSRM spec should specify which version of WS-Addressing is used by 

> the spec.
> 
> A related issue is that:
> On page 25, lines 664-666 talk about the default 
> "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/fault"; as the Fault 
> [action] property. This default is defined only for the SOAP binding and 

> is meant to be used with WS-Addr faults not WSRM faults.
> 
> Justification:
> Without clearly indicating which version of WS-Addressing is 
> required/used by the spec, independent implementation will not 
> interoperate. WS-Addressing specification has changed substantially (in 
> certain sections/artifacts of the WS-Addressing spec) over the years.
> 
> Target: core
> 
> Type: design
> 
> Proposal:
> Use the CR version of the spec [2] (in this paragraph as well as the 
> normative reference for the spec) for now and make changes as the 
> addressing spec transitions through the process of becoming a REC. Based 

> on the WS-Addr schedule and WSRM schedule, WS-Addr is slated to become a 

> REC before WSRM is final.
> 
> For the related issue:
> change line 664 from --
> "WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property the 
> default fault"
> to --
> "WS-ReliableMessaging faults MUST include as the [action] property as 
> defined by WS-Addressing [ref]."
> and
> delete lines 665-667
> 
> Related issues: none
> 
> [1] 
> 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/14548/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-ws-addr-core-20050817/