Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Presence of NACK and ACK range in the same message

[Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>]

+1

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295

Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote on 09/20/2005 03:27:19 
PM:

> Title: Presence of NACK and ACK range in the same message
> 
> Description:
> 
> Page 15, lines 344-345 say:
> "This element MUST NOT be present if <wsrm:Nack> is also present as a 
> child of <wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement>."
> 
> Given that there can be multiple SeqAck headers in a message, this is 
> true only for the same header and not across headers.
> 
> Justification:
> 
> WSRM allows multiple SeqAck headers, therefore one can Nack sequence "A" 

> in one header and Ack Sequence "B" in another header in the same 
message.
> 
> Target: core
> 
> Type: editorial
> 
> Proposal:
> Replace the sentence in question with "... MUST NOT be present if a 
> sibling <wsrm:Nack> element is also present ..."
> 
> Related issues: none
> 
> 
> [1] 
> 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/14548/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf