ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue i003 proposal
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:57:03 -0400
Well, sort of. Look at my proposal
for issue 10 since its related (just sent it this morning and kavi won't
give me a link to it yet).
The spec isn't totally silent on whether
there's a binary relationship - it should be though :-)
-Doug
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
09/22/2005 03:13 AM
|
To
| wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-rx] Issue i003 proposal |
|
All,
I took an action to send a proposal for issue i003 [1].
Issue i003 was raised during the 1st f2f when there was a statement made
that the Sequence was a binary relationship between two Endpoints. This
statement raised the the question as to which two endpoints were
involved. One of course was wsrm:AcksTo, what is the other one (the RMD
does not necessarily have a wsa:EndpointReference or a WSDL description
for that matter)?
The spec itself does not have such a statement and therefore I don't
think this is an issue against the spec. I propose that we close this
issue with no action.
Comments?
-Anish
--
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/14604/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i003
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]