RE: [ws-rx] Action Item list updated

[Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

I sent mail re. what is now action 0040.  See attached.

All the best, Ashok
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rutt [mailto:tom@coastin.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:06 AM
> To: wsrx
> Subject: [ws-rx] Action Item list updated
> 
> I just updated the Action Item list based on the minutes of 
> the Face to
> Face:
> 
> The Action Item list is at: 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/members/act
ion_items.php
> 
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
> 
> 
> 
>

--- Begin Message ---

• From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
• To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
• Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 06:49:36 -0700

> Action: Ashok to write proposed clarification text on meaning 
> of "observed" in this spec.

We decided that a clarification of the word 'observed' as applied to
policy assertion was required.  I offer proposed wording for this below.  This will need to be tweaked to harmonize with the wording that it clarifies.

"The word 'observed' in the above paragraph should be interpreted in the sense of wsp:Observed which, in earlier versions of WS-Policy 
(see ftp://www6.software.ibm.com/software/developer/library/ws-policy2003.pdf), was a value for the wsp:Usage attribute that identified how the assertion was to be processed.  Assertions that are 'observed' become properties of the policy subject but do not influence the content of messages."

All the best, Ashok
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rutt [mailto:tom@coastin.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:12 PM
> To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-rx] Action items from Wed F2f
> > Here are the new action items from wed f2f
> 
> S1
> ACTION: Gil will write up a change bar proposal for both WDs 
> and CDs  to the TC.
> 
> S2
> Action: Anish will propose text to clarify in the current 
> document the protocol is at least once, and that the DAs are 
> subservient to this protocol.
> 
> S3
> Action: Abbie to raise new issue to have state diagram in the spec.
> 
> S4
> Action: Chris F to Raise a new issue on whether text to 
> resolve issue 9 is to be an assertion or parameter.
> 
> S5
> Action: Tom to raise a new issue to align the main document 
> text with resolution to issue 9.
> 
> S6
> Action:: Tom R to submit a concrete proposal to resolve Issue 
> 008 for discussion by the TC members on the email list.
> 
> S7
> Action: Chris F to provide a detailed proposal on issue 30 
> for voting by the TC.
> 
> S8
> ACTION: Marc G will ensure that the issue list contains 
> pointers to the minutes discussion which carried the resolution.
> 
> S9
> Action: Ashok to write proposed clarification text on meaning 
> of "observed" in this spec.
> 
> S10
> Action: Anish to propose use of an explicit marker for NO 
> messages received.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Tom Rutt
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744
> Fax: +1 732 774 5133
> email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> 
> 
> 
>

--- End Message ---