RE: [ws-rx] i010 - a proposal

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Per my AI for issue 10 here's what I
came up with.
As much as I tried I really couldn't
find a nice way to define RM Source and RM Destination to make it clear
that they were not limited to just one endpoint or port. The closest I
came was to add some text to the definitLinkion
of each that talked about how they were not limited to one endpoint blah
blah blah...    But I thought that wouldn't be any better than
my original proposal because it would probably make people stop and think
too much about what we were trying to say.  So, what I came up with
was this:
- remove the "endpoint" in
places where we said "RM Source endpoint" and "RM Destination
endpoint" - as Jacques suggested
- tweak the "exactly two parties"
sentence we talked about during the f2f
- remove the tying of the RM Source/Destination
to the WS-Addr headers in the CreateSequence section
- add just *1* sentence expanding the
scope of the RM Source and RM destination concept in the RM Model section.
 I tried to keep this sentence short so to not over-complicate things
but still allow the freedom I was looking for.

I've attached a pdf file of the spec
with the change bars on.  You should find 9 changes.  For easy
finding they're on line #s: 80, 146, 213, 305, 313, 315, 435, 436, 475,


thanks
-Doug

issue10.pdf