[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] i010 - a proposal
Doug: the defs of RMD and RMS still define them
as "endpoints", which will maintain the confusion. How about RMS as "implementation of
this specification supporting the Send and Transmit operations, usually
associated with the endpoint reference of a WS or of its client", and RMD
as "implementation of this specification supporting the Receive and Deliver
operations, usually associated with the endpoint reference of a WS or of its client." That would just "associate"
endpoints to the RMS/RMD (not excluding several endpoints, as well as not
excluding several addressable RM entities cooperating as a single RMS or RMD). Other places where "endpoint"
is too tightly associated with RMS or RMD: Line 786-789:
"This fault is sent by either the RM Source or the RM
Destination to indicate that the endpoint that generated the fault..."
mentions of endpoint to be removed in this
paragraph too. Line
1302: (Appendix B4) "The sending endpoint discovers
that message number 2 was not received..." Jacques From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]