OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: Revised proposal for i053


Marc,
 
It looks like a workable solution.
 
Thanks,
 
--umit
 


From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 3:42 PM
To: Yalcinalp, Umit; Jonathan Marsh
Cc: wsrx
Subject: Revised proposal for i053

After reviewing our previous proposal for i053 we have come to the conclusion that the only URI references that need to be updated to IRI are those that are inherited from WS-Addressing. There are three of these changes from URI to IRI are all around WS-A Action, two are in the same paragraph saying that unless there is a value (a IRI) for Action derived from WS-A rules it is a value defined in WS-RM (a URI). The other is about using the default value for Fault (a IRI) from WS-A in Action.

 

It is not necessary to change the sequence identifier to IRI as we previously proposed. Therefore we propose the following changes to satisfy i053, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i053.

 

These are the references to URI that should and should not be updated to IRI in WS-RM [1]:

111: keep URI

122: IRI

123: IRI

124: keep URI

291: keep URI

321: keep URI

357: keep URI

451: keep URI

511: keep URI

556: keep URI

613: keep URI

656: keep URI

695: IRI

 

Plus of course add the reference to the IRI spec.

1 wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-05.pdf  http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/15001/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-05.pdf

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]