Re: [ws-rx] Re: Are i035 and i061 dupes?

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

+1
-Anish
--

Doug Davis wrote:
> 
> They are definitely related.  If I remember correctly i035 was opened to 
> make sure we do something with anonymous URIs.  Umit was going to track 
> what happened with WSA and at the F2F I raised a concern that no matter 
> what the WSA WG did it probably wouldn't satisfy all of our needs - 
> especially w.r.t. piggy-backing of acks.  Hence issue i061 was opened to 
> cover that.  I think i035 can be closed w/o action since WSA has text 
> that describes what anonymous URIs means in the generic sense.  And I 
> think i061 is still needed to explain the new notion of piggy-backing 
> and creation of new messages (for acks) where otherwise one would not be 
> sent.
> thanks
> -Doug
> 
> 
> 
> *"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>*
> 
> 12/06/2005 12:33 PM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
> cc
> 	"wsrx" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject
> 	Are i035 and i061 dupes?
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In reviewing the issue list today I’m wondering if i035 and i061 are 
> dupes of each other. They sure seem like it.
>  
> i035  What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo EPR?  
> _http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i035_
>  
> i061  Anonymous AcksTo  
> _http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i061_
>  
>  
>  
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: _http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/_
>