Re: [ws-rx] Issue i076 discussion

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Not sure I understand your question (perhaps because my comment wasn't 
clear).

Matt's proposal uses the SOAP terminology 'initial sender' and 'ultimate 
receiver' and I'm suggesting that perhaps we need to use AS and AD instead.

-Anish
--

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> 
> In what context?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote on 12/07/2005 
> 01:22:09 PM:
> 
>  > +1
>  >
>  > Minor nit: do we need to use the SOAP terminology of 'Ultimate Receiver'
>  > and 'Initial Sender'. Nothing against it, but we have not been using
>  > that terminology in the spec.
>  >
>  > -Anish
>  > --
>  >
>  > Matthew Lovett wrote:
>  > >
>  > > Hi all,
>  > >
>  > > Here is a PDF version of my proposal for i076, created against
>  > > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07.pdf
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Thanks,
>  > >
>  > > Matt
>  > >
>  > >