ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] Issue i076 discussion
- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:56:09 -0500
Ah,
Thanks... I agree that we should be
using the terms AS and AD and not the SOAP terms.
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
wrote on 12/07/2005 02:33:45 PM:
> Not sure I understand your question (perhaps because my comment wasn't
> clear).
>
> Matt's proposal uses the SOAP terminology 'initial sender' and 'ultimate
> receiver' and I'm suggesting that perhaps we need to use AS and AD
instead.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> >
> > In what context?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Christopher Ferris
> > STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> > blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html
> > phone: +1 508 377 9295
> >
> > Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote on 12/07/2005
> > 01:22:09 PM:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Minor nit: do we need to use the SOAP terminology
of 'Ultimate Receiver'
> > > and 'Initial Sender'. Nothing against it, but we have
not been using
> > > that terminology in the spec.
> > >
> > > -Anish
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthew Lovett wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Here is a PDF version of my proposal for i076,
created against
> > > > wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07.pdf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > >
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]