[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: WS-RM and WS-RMPolicy references
Here are some questions with proposed answers for the TC to consider re the WS-RM [1] and RMPolicy references [2]. This email corresponds to the action item that Chris Ferris and I took this morning at the F2F meeting. 1. [SOAP] W3C Note, "SOAP: Simple Object Access Protocol 1.1," 08 May 2000. Q: Should the TC add a normative reference to SOAP 1.2? A: Given that Section 4 Faults refers to both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2, I propose that a normative reference to SOAP 1.2 should be added. 2. [XML-ns] W3C Recommendation, "Namespaces in XML," 14 January 1999. Q: Should the TC update this reference to Namespaces in XML 1.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/)? A: Namespaces in XML 1.1 is meant to be used with XML 1.1 document so I expect we should NOT make this change since neither SOAP 1.1 nor SOAP 1.2 reference XML 1.1. See my suggestion below about adding a reference to XML 1.0. 3. [WS-Addressing] D. Box, et al, "Web Services Addressing (WS-Addressing)," August 2004. This reference should be re-considered when the deferred Issue 42 is resolved. 4. [SecurityPolicy] G. Della-Libra, "Web Services Security Policy Language (WS-SecurityPolicy)," December 2002. Q: Should the TC update his reference to the most recent version of the Security Policy document which is dated July 2005 (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy/ <http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy/> )? A. Since the July 2005 document has been contributed to the OASIS WS-SX TC, I propose that we update this non-normative reference to the most recent published version. 5. [XML] Q: Should the TC consider adding a normative reference to XML 1.0 Third Edition? Note that RMPolicy already refers to XML 1.0 Third Edition. A: Yes. I propose that a reference to XML be added to the RM Abstract. I propose that the text: >By using the SOAP [SOAP] and WSDL [WSDL] extensibility model, be changed to match the following text from RMPolicy: >By using the XML [XML], SOAP [SOAP], and WSDL [WSDL 1.1] extensibility models, Note to Editors: RM uses the reference form [WSDL] and RMPolicy uses the form [WSDL 1.1]. I suggest you harmonize the form of the "WSDL" references across the two documents. 6. RMPolicy references a) [SOAP] I propose we also add a reference to SOAP 1.2 and leave it to the Editor's to figure out where the reference should be used. b) [XML-NS] I propose no change as per my point above. c) [WS-Addressing] Not used in RMPolicy d) [SecurityPolicy] Not used in RMPolicy. e) [XML] A reference to XML 1.0 Third Edition already exists in RMPolicy. /paulc [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/15789/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-07.pdf [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/15796/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-02.pdf Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]