RE: [ws-rx] Action Item #0053

["Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>]

I don't think the namespace document needs to reference any of the specs examples.

________________________________

From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Wed 14/12/2005 8:36 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Action Item #0053


In response to Paul Cotton's answers to issue (2) I have split the single RDDL document into two separate RDDL documents; one for the WS-RM namespace URI and another for the WS-RM Policy namespace URI. I have also included Chris' "namespace URI change policy" into the RDDLs for the benefit of human readers.
 
There are some other issues that we need to discuss. Chris has made a suggestion to incorporate the OASIS-metadata in the RDDL documents but I haven't investigated this fully.
 
- g


________________________________

	From: Gilbert Pilz 
	Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:39 PM
	To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
	Subject: [ws-rx] Action Item #0053
	
	
	Attached is the proposed RDDL document for http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510 and http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510 (thanks to Steve Winkler for getting the ball rolling on this). There are a number of issues that need to be worked through the TC.
	 
	1.) The editors want to add links to resources describing schema and WSDL. We think it makes sense to pull the schema and WSDL out of the main specs and put them in separate files. These files could be pulled into the main specs before publishing as WDs or CDs. This prevents us from having to synchronize changes between the main specs and the actual schema and WSDL files.
	 
	2.) Can we/should we use a single RDDL document to describe two distinct namespaces? Will software agents be able to disambiguate between the links for the WS-RM schema and the WS-RM Policy schema? Do we need to maintain two separate copies of the same RDDL document or can we use some re-direction tricks to use just one copy?
	 
	- g