Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Conference Call modified

[Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com>]

Hi Paul,

I'd quite like to try and clean up some
of the issues that affect the core spec early in this call. Issues i078,
i083, i084 seem to have clear proposals. Would it be possible to move them
to the top of the issue discussions?

Following those, issue i075 has a concrete
proposal on list (thanks Dug, Umit), so perhaps it's a good candidate for
the first of the policy debates? The description of i008 says that it depends
on the outcome of i021, but I'm not sure that is true, as the proposal
seems OK as it is. Given that, I think we should keep those two in the
current order.

Finally, i058 doesn't seem to have any
proposed resolution. I think it makes more sense to complete the state
table (hopefully with the outcome of the core issues we are discussing
early on the call) and then come up with a concrete proposal on this list.

I think that gives us:

> i078 Lost TerminateSequence
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i078

> i083                
Tom Rutt                
Fault Messages for Terminated Sequence
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i083

> i084                
Matthew Lovett              
  RMS state table and SequenceClosedFault
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i084

> i075 Case of multiple RM Policies and DAs within an RMD scope
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i075

> i008 Policy assertions granularity
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i008

> i021 An RM Policy applies two-way
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i021

> i058 State Transition Table
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i058

I appreciate that this note comes out
at short notice, so it the chairs/TC don't have time to adopt these suggestions
than that's fine.

Thanks,

Matt