From: Patil, Sanjay
[mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
Sent: January 17, 2006 6:22 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Action Item
53: new RDDL docs
Thanks to Gil, Steve and Chris for working
on the RDDL drafts.
I suggest that the TC members go through
these drafts before our weekly call (on 1/19). There are some lurking
questions in the background that we never clearly nailed down such as --
a> What is the scope/applicability of
RDDL documents? Do we want to publish RDDL documents for the Committee Drafts
also (as opposed to waiting until CS)?
b> What is our namespace versioning
policy? The TC has seen a proposal from Chris/PaulC [1] and there was some
subsequent discussion on the mailing list. But the TC never formally approved
this policy as such.
c> What is the scope/applicability (WD,
CD, CS) of namespace versioning policy?
I will add agenda item(s) to go over the
above matters on the coming call since some of the related decisions would
affect our CD II planning.
Thanks,
Sanjay
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200509/msg00189.html
From: Gilbert
Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006 14:13
PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Action Item 53:
new RDDL docs
These documents are
basically a merge of the work Steve Winkler and I did (RDDL 2.0) and some ideas
Chris Ferris had (using a micro-format to include artifact metadata). While
they are not perfect, I believe they are fleshed out enough to be considered
for inclusion into the TC's deliverables.
I think AI 53 can
now be closed.