[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] i061 proposal / directions
Rich, I don't think Lei was saying that *every* SOAP intermediary needs to have knowledge of the WSDL of the ultimate destination, just that some nodes may and that these nodes may elect to return a 202 before they have any knowledge of the results of subsequent downstream processing (obviously they would only elect to do this in the case of one-way operations). - g > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Salz [mailto:rsalz@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:01 PM > To: Lei Jin > Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-rx] i061 proposal / directions > > "Lei Jin" <ljin@bea.com> wrote on 01/24/2006 08:39:35 PM: > > > For example, in an ESB implementation, an intermediary can hold a > > bunch of WSDLs for a number of backend services that it routes > > messages to. > > I think it would be a real bad idea to make WSDL a > requirement. You really don't want to require every > intermediary to have prior knowledge of all WSDL files for > every message that it might ever see. It'd be hard to call > that "loosely coupled." > > /r$ > > -- > SOA Appliance Group > IBM Application Integration Middleware > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]