ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [i089] a revised proposal
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:31:10 -0500
For issue 089, I'd like to offer this
revised proposed text (same basic idea just different wording):
After line 441 of [1] add:
Messages sent using this protocol MUST
NOT use a wsa:To value that would prohibit the RM Source from retransmitting
unacknowledged messages. For example, using WS-Addressing's anonymous IRI,
without any additional transmission mechanism, would restrict an RM Source's
ability to re-establishing a new connection to the RM Destination when
a re-transmission of a message is needed. Note, that this implicitly
impacts possibles values used in other places - for example, in wsa:ReplyTo
when responses are expected to be transmitted reliably.
thanks,
-Doug
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16095/wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-08.pdf
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]