Re: [ws-rx] i021 proposal

[Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>]

Doug, Umit,

I think there is a simplicity to this. What you are sating is that there 
is no way of expressing in a req-resp WSDL the fact that both directions 
are expected to be reliable.
That may be a logical conclusion but its not clear that it fits the 
expected usage of RM in a req-resp scenario.

Paul

Doug Davis wrote:
>
> "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> wrote on 02/09/2006 
> 09:43:16 PM:
> ...
> > It seems to me if it would be cleaner to leave the one-way policy
> > assertion at the input message only, so that for the "outbound messages"
> > the receiving end's policy assertion would apply. I am thinking in terms
> > reconciling the policies of RMS and RMD at both ends (including
> > extensibility). I think binding/operation/input message should be
> > sufficient and is simpler.
>
> +1 - keep it simple (and consistent with the other ws-* specs)
>
> -Doug

-- 

Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com