RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

IMHO, it does not, but that is my opinion :-)

 

Having said that, there was quite a long discussion on this today at the WS-A concall.

Some members of the wg (myself NOT included) believe that  the definition of anonymous only applies to the single MEP and hence it would not apply to acksTo.

 

--umit

 

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, Feb 20, 2006 3:35 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI

Tom - can you provide a pointer to where in WSA it limits its use as you describe (single MEP exchange)?
thanks
-Doug

Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>

02/20/2006 06:11 PM

Please respond to
tom

To	wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI

NEW ISSUE: wsrm:acksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURK

Problem statement:

The wsa:anonymousURI is defiined in WS addressing for use in a single
MEP exchange.

What we really need in wsrm:acksTo is a uri which has the intended
semantics:

"return the wsrm:acknolwedgment soap header in the underlying response
to any soap request which contains a wsrm defined soap header with
this sequenceID."

This is really quite specialized semantics, and should be defined with a
wsrm: specific URI.

Proposal:

Define a wsrm specific URI which has the desired semantics for use in
the wsrm:acksTo URI.

--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt                 email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133