ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI
- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:01:50 -0500
I would not have thought that it was
limited in this manner. Nor do I think that it should be. Maybe I need
to lurk on the WS-A calls:-)
I'd like to understand the architectural
rationale given for such a constraint.
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
wrote on 02/20/2006 06:58:21 PM:
> IMHO, it does not, but that is my opinion :-)
>
> Having said that, there was quite a long discussion
on this today at
> the WS-A concall.
> Some members of the wg (myself NOT included)
believe that the
> definition of anonymous only applies to the single MEP and hence it
> would not apply to acksTo.
>
> --umit
>
>
> From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, Feb 20, 2006 3:35 PM
> To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI
>
> Tom - can you provide a pointer to where in WSA it limits its use
as
> you describe (single MEP exchange)?
> thanks
> -Doug
>
>
>
> Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
> 02/20/2006 06:11 PM
>
> Please respond to
> tom
>
> To
>
> wsrx <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI
>
>
>
>
> NEW ISSUE: wsrm:acksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURK
>
> Problem statement:
>
> The wsa:anonymousURI is defiined in WS addressing for use in a single
> MEP exchange.
>
> What we really need in wsrm:acksTo is a uri which has the intended
> semantics:
>
> "return the wsrm:acknolwedgment soap header in the underlying
response
> to any soap request which contains a wsrm defined soap header with
> this sequenceID."
>
> This is really quite specialized semantics, and should be defined
with a
> wsrm: specific URI.
>
> Proposal:
>
> Define a wsrm specific URI which has the desired semantics for use
in
> the wsrm:acksTo URI.
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt email:
tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732
774 5133
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]