OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-rx
223 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - Application Notes for WSRM (AppNotes-061-WSR M.doc) uploaded
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Mar 2006 15:24:49 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - Application Notes for WSRM (AppNotes-061-WSRM.doc) uploaded
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 28 Mar 2006 02:57:01 -0000
Next conf-call on Apr 6th
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Mar 2006 18:33:08 -0000
Reminder: No call this week
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 26 Mar 2006 18:26:52 -0000
WS-RX issue list updated - rev 34
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 Mar 2006 01:06:18 -0000
Prelim minutes for Thursday of RTP f2f.
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 23 Mar 2006 21:05:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Re: Issue42: Which version of WS-Addressing
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 23 Mar 2006 16:51:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Re: Issue42: Which version of WS-Addressing
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 23 Mar 2006 16:35:03 -0000
Re: Fw: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Mixing of SOAP and WS-A versions
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 16:34:57 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 23 Mar 2006 14:16:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: misplaced guidance on fault handling
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 13:45:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - Application Notes for WSRM (AppNotes-061-WSRM.doc) uploaded
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 13:30:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 13:30:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 13:18:23 -0000
Re: Issue42: Which version of WS-Addressing
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 23 Mar 2006 12:23:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: misplaced guidance on fault handling
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 23 Mar 2006 12:15:00 -0000
NEW ISSUE: suggested editorial tweaks
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 12:09:13 -0000
NEW ISSUE: description of <Sequence/> element could use some wordsmithing.
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 12:08:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 23 Mar 2006 11:52:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 23 Mar 2006 11:34:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 11:29:47 -0000
NEW ISSUE: misplaced guidance on fault handling
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 11:29:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence Acks on all messages after close
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 11:29:26 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption ofdeliverability
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 23 Mar 2006 09:25:48 -0000
Groups - Application Notes for WSRM (AppNotes-061-WSRM.doc) uploaded
From
jdurand@us.fujitsu.com on 23 Mar 2006 05:19:57 -0000
Prelim minutes of f2f for Wed 3/22
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 22 Mar 2006 22:34:11 -0000
Fw: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Mixing of SOAP and WS-A versions
From
Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Mar 2006 22:17:03 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0056 Ensure that the final WSA specif...
From
tom@coastin.com on 22 Mar 2006 21:27:47 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0088 Chris F will send a consolidated...
From
tom@coastin.com on 22 Mar 2006 21:27:16 -0000
New Issue: Nacks ack as well as Nack
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 22 Mar 2006 21:14:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Re: i007 WSS 1.0/1.1 token support
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 20:09:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:57:04 -0000
WS-RX issue list updated - Revision: 33
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:42:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:39:16 -0000
consolidated i021 proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:33:51 -0000
Re: i007 WSS 1.0/1.1 token support
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:12:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX March F2F modified
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:06:43 -0000
New Issue; SequenceAcknowledgement:Final assumption of deliverability
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 22 Mar 2006 19:06:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i021 proposal update
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 18:55:31 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 22 Mar 2006 17:58:34 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 17:06:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 16:57:29 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 16:48:22 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Sequence Acks on all messages after close
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Mar 2006 16:25:22 -0000
Note on behaviour from Interop
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Mar 2006 16:11:24 -0000
Action to summarise issues around non-addressable client / two way
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Mar 2006 15:51:01 -0000
Groups - WS-RX March F2F modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 22 Mar 2006 15:44:08 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Mixing of SOAP and WS-A versions
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 22 Mar 2006 15:40:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Mixing of SOAP and WS-A versions
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:46:09 -0000
Deferred issues?
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:42:24 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 32
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:39:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:31:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Question about resolution of issue i090
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:24:40 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Remove the Partial Answer Mode (PAM)
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:22:59 -0000
Question about resolution of issue i090
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 22 Mar 2006 14:18:44 -0000
State table changes required based on resolved (Closed+Done) issues,plus one new editorial comment
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 22 Mar 2006 11:27:52 -0000
Belated regrets
From
"Charlton Barreto" <cbarreto@adobe.com> on 22 Mar 2006 09:20:37 -0000
NEW ISSUE: consistency in controlling the binding of SequenceAcknowledgement and of seq management responses
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 22 Mar 2006 06:18:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX March F2F modified
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 22 Mar 2006 01:42:40 -0000
regrets: belay that, I sent regrets to the wrong group, regretfully
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 21 Mar 2006 22:39:17 -0000
regrets; travelling
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 21 Mar 2006 22:29:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Draft Timetable for CS
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Mar 2006 20:29:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] RE: Toll-free access number for WS-RX March F2F dial-in?
From
"Paul Knight" <paul.knight@nortel.com> on 21 Mar 2006 19:50:00 -0000
RE: Toll-free access number for WS-RX March F2F dial-in?
From
"Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@microsoft.com> on 21 Mar 2006 19:36:08 -0000
Groups - WS-RX March F2F modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 21 Mar 2006 17:04:47 -0000
Partial regrets for F2F
From
"Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com> on 21 Mar 2006 15:23:45 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0089 chairs will send email on adjust...
From
tom@coastin.com on 20 Mar 2006 16:52:40 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX-031606 (MinutesWSRX-031606.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 20 Mar 2006 16:49:35 -0000
Groups - Application Notes for WSRM (AppNotes-05-WSRM.doc) uploaded
From
jdurand@us.fujitsu.com on 19 Mar 2006 01:36:28 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Chris's corrections were made to 3/2 minutes
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 17 Mar 2006 20:35:26 -0000
Chris's corrections were made to 3/2 minutes
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 17 Mar 2006 18:01:59 -0000
Draft Timetable for CS
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Mar 2006 22:36:38 -0000
Prelim Minutes of 3/15 teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 16 Mar 2006 22:28:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 20:30:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Mar 2006 20:16:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 20:15:19 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Mar 2006 20:14:22 -0000
i021 proposal update
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 20:01:12 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 19:59:55 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 16 Mar 2006 19:56:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rmwork
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 16 Mar 2006 19:44:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 16 Mar 2006 19:42:56 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 19:22:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 16 Mar 2006 19:19:59 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Mar 2006 19:16:27 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rmwork
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 16 Mar 2006 18:44:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rmwork
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 16 Mar 2006 18:28:31 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified - Regrets
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 16 Mar 2006 18:16:30 -0000
Non-voting memebers at the f2f
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 16:42:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i090 - Offer, let's get back to the original question
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 16 Mar 2006 16:37:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i090 - Offer, let's get back to the original question
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 16 Mar 2006 16:32:25 -0000
No new proposed issues this week
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 16 Mar 2006 00:45:38 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 15 Mar 2006 23:48:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2006 17:42:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2006 17:22:35 -0000
Sponsor for 3/16 conf-call facility
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 15 Mar 2006 16:31:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2006 14:08:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2006 03:32:29 -0000
CD3 available
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 15 Mar 2006 00:32:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 15 Mar 2006 00:13:44 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-03_diff.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 15 Mar 2006 00:01:56 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-03_diff.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 15 Mar 2006 00:01:36 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-03.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 15 Mar 2006 00:00:59 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-03.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 15 Mar 2006 00:00:35 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 14 Mar 2006 23:59:50 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf modified
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 14 Mar 2006 23:59:11 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-02-diff.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 14 Mar 2006 23:58:45 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-02-diff.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 14 Mar 2006 23:58:20 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 14 Mar 2006 23:56:20 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf uploaded
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 14 Mar 2006 23:55:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Mar 2006 23:53:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 21:59:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 21:47:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 14 Mar 2006 21:37:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Mar 2006 21:25:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 20:04:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Mar 2006 18:33:13 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i090 - Offer, let's get back to the original question
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Mar 2006 18:05:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Mar 2006 17:57:24 -0000
i090 - Offer, let's get back to the original question
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 17:52:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Mar 2006 17:49:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Mar 2006 17:26:23 -0000
Groups - Minutes WS-RX 3-9-2006 (MinutesWSRX-030906.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 14 Mar 2006 15:49:49 -0000
Proposed items for the Raleigh Face-to-Face Agenda
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 14 Mar 2006 08:11:53 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 3/16 conf-call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 13 Mar 2006 22:09:40 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 13 Mar 2006 21:43:15 -0000
Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 3/16 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 13 Mar 2006 20:35:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 13 Mar 2006 20:31:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 13 Mar 2006 13:58:16 -0000
AnonURI and Offer and WS-Addressing
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 12 Mar 2006 09:41:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rmwork
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 11 Mar 2006 08:59:24 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 31
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 Mar 2006 18:55:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 10 Mar 2006 16:46:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 Mar 2006 16:19:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 10 Mar 2006 16:03:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 10 Mar 2006 15:59:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 Mar 2006 13:14:52 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and syncrm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 10 Mar 2006 08:19:49 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 10 Mar 2006 01:06:36 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 10 Mar 2006 00:31:06 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] our favorite - anon replyTo
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 9 Mar 2006 23:56:22 -0000
An alternative approach to make anon reply-to and sync rm work
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 9 Mar 2006 23:51:17 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of 3/9 Teleconf
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2006 23:06:44 -0000
Prelim Minutes of 3/9 Teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 9 Mar 2006 22:33:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 9 Mar 2006 21:38:15 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0087 Anish provide explanation of the...
From
paul@wso2.com on 9 Mar 2006 21:17:56 -0000
our favorite - anon replyTo
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2006 21:11:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Regrets for 3/9 conf-call
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 9 Mar 2006 21:04:14 -0000
Partial proposal for i090
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 9 Mar 2006 20:43:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
"Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> on 9 Mar 2006 18:55:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2006 18:29:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
"Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortel.com> on 9 Mar 2006 17:18:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2006 17:06:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 9 Mar 2006 16:49:16 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] issue i021 requirements
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 9 Mar 2006 16:21:56 -0000
issue i021 requirements
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 9 Mar 2006 13:06:56 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 9 Mar 2006 03:32:43 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX030206 (MinutesWSRX-030206.html) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 8 Mar 2006 23:10:11 -0000
Issue i099 proposal
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 Mar 2006 22:52:21 -0000
Issue i098 proposal
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 8 Mar 2006 21:29:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Mar 2006 18:21:31 -0000
Regrets for 3/9 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 8 Mar 2006 18:05:14 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 8 Mar 2006 17:52:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Mar 2006 17:22:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC telcon 3/2/06
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 8 Mar 2006 16:12:15 -0000
This weeks agenda
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 8 Mar 2006 16:05:35 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 8 Mar 2006 08:20:04 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] slightly new i021 proposal
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 8 Mar 2006 03:09:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i098 - This is about protocol vs. sequence faults
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 7 Mar 2006 18:49:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i098 - This is about protocol vs. sequence faults
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Mar 2006 18:26:57 -0000
RE: Issue i098 - This is about protocol vs. sequence faults
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Mar 2006 18:25:24 -0000
RE: Issue i098 - This is about protocol vs. sequence faults
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 7 Mar 2006 18:17:26 -0000
New proposal for i101
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 7 Mar 2006 17:51:19 -0000
slightly new i021 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 7 Mar 2006 17:33:36 -0000
Issue i099 - Detail for header related faults in SOAP 1.1
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Mar 2006 17:29:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i098 - This is about protocol vs. sequence faults
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 7 Mar 2006 17:17:22 -0000
Issue i098 - This is about protocol vs. sequence faults
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 7 Mar 2006 17:12:49 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 7 Mar 2006 17:02:25 -0000
i021 semantics
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 7 Mar 2006 16:50:59 -0000
Groups - MinutesWSRX030206 (MinutesWSRX-030206.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 6 Mar 2006 19:14:58 -0000
Issue list updated - rev 30
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 6 Mar 2006 17:58:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC telcon 3/2/06
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 3 Mar 2006 14:50:16 -0000
Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC telcon 3/2/06
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 3 Mar 2006 05:27:55 -0000
Prelim Minutes of WSRX TC telcon 3/2/06
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 2 Mar 2006 22:52:03 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i021 Proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 2 Mar 2006 21:12:12 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 21:02:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 21:00:52 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 2 Mar 2006 20:59:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: WSRX:AcksTo should not use wsa:AnonymousURI
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 2 Mar 2006 20:55:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 2 Mar 2006 20:42:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 20:40:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 20:29:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 2 Mar 2006 20:20:52 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Clarifications on two-way and anonymous clients
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 20:09:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089, i090 - Scenario 2.4 Request-Reply, Anonymous Client
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 2 Mar 2006 19:35:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i021 Proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 18:56:29 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i021 Proposal
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 2 Mar 2006 18:22:52 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 2 Mar 2006 18:12:23 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 2 Mar 2006 17:42:11 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 2 Mar 2006 17:37:38 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Clarifications on two-way and anonymous clients
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 2 Mar 2006 17:33:41 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:53:29 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Editorial comments on WSRM WD 10
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:52:52 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Recommend RMD Close rather than Terminate
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:40:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Editorial comments on WSRM WD 10
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:35:01 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Editorial comments on WSRM WD 10
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:32:50 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Editorial comments on WSRM WD 10
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:27:30 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Language for faultstring elements
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 16:26:50 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Editorial comments on WSRM WD 10
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 15:59:41 -0000
Editorial comments on WSRM WD 10
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 2 Mar 2006 15:30:25 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Raleigh F2F Concerns
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Mar 2006 21:40:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] : clarify difference between "sequence" and "non-sequence" faults
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Mar 2006 21:30:58 -0000
Raleigh F2F Concerns
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 Mar 2006 21:14:40 -0000
New Issue: Can't relate faults to Sequences using SOAP 1.1
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Mar 2006 21:12:08 -0000
NEW ISSUE: clarify difference between "sequence" and "non-sequence" faults
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 1 Mar 2006 20:37:50 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 1 Mar 2006 20:32:36 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Clarifications on two-way and anonymous clients
From
"Stefan Batres" <stefanba@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 19:35:49 -0000
Groups - Action Item Modified: #0084 Marc G will give answers to ques...
From
mgoodner@microsoft.com on 1 Mar 2006 17:07:19 -0000
I cannot take minutes this week
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 1 Mar 2006 15:42:02 -0000
Groups - Minutes WSRX TC 2/23/2006 (MinutesWSRX-022306.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 1 Mar 2006 15:25:50 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0082 Doug will make the submissions a...
From
dug@us.ibm.com on 1 Mar 2006 15:11:59 -0000
RE: Groups - New Action Item #0084 Marc G will give answers to ques...
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 1 Mar 2006 15:10:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i021 Proposal
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 1 Mar 2006 14:09:53 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2