OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ws-rx
160 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 1 May 2006 00:49:05 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 29 Apr 2006 06:41:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Apr 2006 03:08:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 29 Apr 2006 03:08:21 -0000
RX Issue list Rev 37
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2006 18:33:13 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 28 Apr 2006 16:51:20 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Regrets for next week's concall (5/4/2006)
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 28 Apr 2006 11:24:49 -0000
Call schedule May/June
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 28 Apr 2006 09:56:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2006 09:36:37 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 28 Apr 2006 09:16:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2006 09:01:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 28 Apr 2006 08:36:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2006 08:31:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2006 08:21:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 28 Apr 2006 08:12:44 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 28 Apr 2006 07:57:32 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 27 Apr 2006 21:46:51 -0000
Draft minutes of 04/27 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 27 Apr 2006 21:43:06 -0000
Regrets for next week's concall (5/4/2006)
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 27 Apr 2006 21:33:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Apr 2006 20:02:08 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 - a revisted proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Apr 2006 19:53:46 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 27 Apr 2006 19:52:57 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Apr 2006 19:49:21 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 - a revisted proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2006 19:30:34 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2006 19:28:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 - a revisted proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Apr 2006 19:01:38 -0000
i115 side-note; possible editorial issue
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 27 Apr 2006 18:33:51 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 27 Apr 2006 18:19:04 -0000
Issue 106 addendum to proposal:
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 27 Apr 2006 15:07:55 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] regrets for Today's call
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 27 Apr 2006 14:49:28 -0000
i089 - a revisted proposal
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2006 14:42:04 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal 5 - Clarify impact of SOAP protocol binding inuse
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2006 12:28:49 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 27 Apr 2006 11:19:54 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 27 Apr 2006 09:56:09 -0000
Groups - proposed state table update (state-tables-JD-3-diffs.rtf) uploaded
From
jdurand@us.fujitsu.com on 27 Apr 2006 00:35:24 -0000
RX new proposed issues 4/20 - 4/26
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Apr 2006 23:45:43 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 21:45:26 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 21:03:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Apr 2006 20:33:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 20:08:39 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Apr 2006 19:58:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 26 Apr 2006 19:58:07 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal 5 - Clarify impact of SOAP protocol bindingin use
From
Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM> on 26 Apr 2006 19:51:47 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 Proposal 5 - Clarify impact of SOAP protocol binding in use
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 19:28:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 19:14:40 -0000
i089 Proposal 5 - Clarify impact of SOAP protocol binding in use
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Apr 2006 19:00:09 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 26 Apr 2006 18:49:24 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] regrets for Today's call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 18:21:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2006 17:11:35 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 26 Apr 2006 16:36:08 -0000
regrets for Today's call
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 26 Apr 2006 15:14:45 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2006 11:45:47 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] More on i113
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 26 Apr 2006 09:14:55 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 26 Apr 2006 05:55:20 -0000
More on i113
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 26 Apr 2006 03:11:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 23:00:54 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 25 Apr 2006 22:41:59 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 25 Apr 2006 22:25:00 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 22:14:37 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 25 Apr 2006 21:48:22 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 Apr 2006 21:14:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 18:49:52 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 Apr 2006 18:38:35 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 25 Apr 2006 18:13:30 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 Apr 2006 18:13:27 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-08-diff.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-08-diff.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 25 Apr 2006 17:32:11 -0000
Groups - wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-08.pdf (wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-08.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 25 Apr 2006 17:29:48 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-12-diff.pdf (wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-12-diff.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 25 Apr 2006 17:28:30 -0000
Groups - wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-12.pdf (wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-12.pdf) uploaded
From
gilbert.pilz@bea.com on 25 Apr 2006 17:24:42 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 25 Apr 2006 16:35:38 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 13:02:16 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 12:33:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 12:17:11 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 Apr 2006 12:09:15 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 09:40:49 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 25 Apr 2006 09:40:48 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 Apr 2006 03:25:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 25 Apr 2006 02:55:40 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 24 Apr 2006 22:13:44 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 24 Apr 2006 22:03:28 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 24 Apr 2006 21:58:04 -0000
issue 115: clarifying question
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 24 Apr 2006 21:37:45 -0000
Groups - minutes wsrx 4/20/2006 (MinutesWsrx-42006.htm) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 24 Apr 2006 17:07:47 -0000
Groups - ws-rx teleconf minutes 4/13/2006 (MinutesWSRX-041306.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 24 Apr 2006 14:27:18 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal - and another one
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 24 Apr 2006 11:57:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 24 Apr 2006 08:07:32 -0000
RE: Issue 113 on state tables
From
"Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 21 Apr 2006 19:01:24 -0000
Issue 113 on state tables
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Apr 2006 17:33:40 -0000
RE: Issue 115 mU RM attribute - proposal 2
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Apr 2006 17:28:29 -0000
RX Issue list updated to Rev 36
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Apr 2006 17:21:27 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 21 Apr 2006 17:21:06 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Issue 21 resolution text contains language about 'parameters' which don't exist
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 20 Apr 2006 23:29:03 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Issue 21 resolution text contains language about 'parameters' which don't exist
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 20 Apr 2006 23:17:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Issue 21 resolution text contains language about 'parameters' which don't exist
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 20 Apr 2006 23:10:43 -0000
testing
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Apr 2006 21:49:21 -0000
4-20-06 telcon draft minutes
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Apr 2006 21:29:58 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Issue 21 resolution text contains language about 'parameters'which don't exist
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2006 20:49:02 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What is the effective policy when RM policyassertion is present at multiple places?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2006 20:18:33 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What is the effective policy when RM policyassertion is present at multiple places?
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 20 Apr 2006 19:37:48 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What is the effective policy when RM policyassertion is present at multiple places?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2006 19:11:44 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: What is the effective policy when RM policy assertion is present at multiple places?
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 20 Apr 2006 18:53:04 -0000
RE: NEW ISSUE: What is the effective policy when RM policyassertion is present at multiple places?
From
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2006 14:29:30 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on 4/20 conf-call
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Apr 2006 09:08:18 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 20 Apr 2006 08:53:26 -0000
NEW ISSUE: What is the effective policy when RM policy assertionis present at multiple places?
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2006 06:16:45 -0000
Proposed issues for Apr 20 RX TC call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 20 Apr 2006 00:30:43 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 19 Apr 2006 23:00:58 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on 4/20 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Apr 2006 22:31:55 -0000
Roll call of 4/13 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 19 Apr 2006 22:02:45 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issues for discussion on 4/20 conf-call
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 19 Apr 2006 18:41:22 -0000
RE: Issue 115 mU RM attribute questions
From
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> on 18 Apr 2006 23:33:56 -0000
Issue 115 mU RM attribute questions
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 18 Apr 2006 21:58:50 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal - and another one
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 18 Apr 2006 18:30:33 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] i089 proposal
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 18 Apr 2006 18:17:24 -0000
Issues for discussion on 4/20 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 17 Apr 2006 17:57:18 -0000
FYI ( Published US Patent applicaiton 20060047947)
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 17 Apr 2006 16:09:07 -0000
Cannot take notes on Thursday
From
"Tom Rutt" <tom@coastin.com> on 17 Apr 2006 11:04:33 -0000
RX Issue list update 35
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 14 Apr 2006 21:19:45 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Add Max Msg Num to Message Number Rollover Fault
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 14 Apr 2006 19:31:19 -0000
Prelim Minutes of 4/13 Teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 13 Apr 2006 21:32:41 -0000
Attribute extensibility added to the resolution of issue i099 bythe editors
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 13 Apr 2006 20:32:30 -0000
[Fwd: Microsoft Published Patent Application Disclosure Regarding theWS-Reliable Messaging Specification]
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 13 Apr 2006 19:40:43 -0000
Proposed issues for April 13th TC call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 13 Apr 2006 00:10:40 -0000
New Issue: "must understand" attribute for extensions to RM components
From
"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> on 12 Apr 2006 21:38:29 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
sanjay.patil@sap.com on 12 Apr 2006 21:18:49 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] Add Max Msg Num to CSR
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Apr 2006 15:34:27 -0000
Groups - Minutes wsrx tc 4/6/2006 (MinutesWSRX-040606.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 12 Apr 2006 14:52:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Sequence state in event of MessageNumberRollover
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 12 Apr 2006 13:42:04 -0000
proposed changes for i106
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 12 Apr 2006 13:29:57 -0000
Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 4/13 conf-call
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 10 Apr 2006 20:21:42 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 7 Apr 2006 20:31:46 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 7 Apr 2006 18:39:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: figure 2 out of date
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 7 Apr 2006 12:19:34 -0000
NEW ISSUE: tightening-up the state tables
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 6 Apr 2006 22:37:37 -0000
Issue 106 Proposal 3
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 6 Apr 2006 22:34:45 -0000
Prelim Minutes 4/6/ teleconf
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 6 Apr 2006 21:45:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] i089 proposal - and another one
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 6 Apr 2006 19:53:44 -0000
i089 proposal
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 6 Apr 2006 19:38:06 -0000
NEW ISSUE: Sequence state in event of MessageNumberRollover
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 6 Apr 2006 19:22:15 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i096
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 6 Apr 2006 18:26:21 -0000
New issues for April 6th RX call
From
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> on 5 Apr 2006 23:58:46 -0000
NEW ISSUE: dangling reference to timing params
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 5 Apr 2006 20:37:05 -0000
issue i108 proposal revised
From
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> on 5 Apr 2006 19:06:21 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i096
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 5 Apr 2006 16:38:22 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i096
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Apr 2006 15:56:10 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue i096
From
Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com> on 5 Apr 2006 15:23:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i096
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Apr 2006 14:15:07 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Issue i096
From
"Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> on 5 Apr 2006 13:53:55 -0000
Issue i096
From
Matthew Lovett <MLOVETT@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Apr 2006 13:29:02 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 5 Apr 2006 03:07:25 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 106 Alternative Proposal - Rough idea - resend withattachment
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 Apr 2006 21:46:20 -0000
Re: [ws-rx] Issue 106 Alternative Proposal - Rough idea - resend withattachment
From
Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> on 4 Apr 2006 21:42:39 -0000
Issue 106 Alternative Proposal - Rough idea - resend with attachment
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 4 Apr 2006 21:29:25 -0000
Issue 106 Alternative Proposal - Rough idea
From
"Bob Freund-Hitachi" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com> on 4 Apr 2006 21:22:33 -0000
Groups - WS-RX TC Weekly Meeting modified
From
paul@wso2.com on 4 Apr 2006 04:31:59 -0000
Groups - InteropScenarios.doc uploaded
From
paul@wso2.com on 4 Apr 2006 04:01:32 -0000
RE: [ws-rx] Groups - Application Notes for WSRM (AppNotes-061-WSR M.doc) uploaded
From
Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> on 4 Apr 2006 03:18:06 -0000
Groups - Action Item Closed: #0091 Paul C will initiate discussion ...
From
tom@coastin.com on 3 Apr 2006 16:48:17 -0000
Action Items Updated
From
Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> on 3 Apr 2006 16:46:20 -0000
Groups - MinutesWS-RXF2F-032306 (MinutesWSRX-f2f-032306.html) uploaded
From
tom@coastin.com on 3 Apr 2006 16:32:04 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2